B"H
I think it’s fair to say that there is a general consensus in this country right now, especially among Afro-Americans, that our country needs to engage in a deep and serious conversation about race. If anyone doubts it, just review the news headlines over the past 12 months; the racist tirade of Michael Richards, the racist and insensitive remarks of Don Imus, white church-goers singing hymns in blackface, the public question raised in the Presidential campaign, “Is Barack Obama ‘black’ enough?”, the double standard of punishment and justice for the Jena 6, and now the fallout over the remarks of Fox News TV host Bill O’Reilly.
I fear that perhaps it will take an event of greater catastrophic significance before we begin to take up this topic seriously. Time after time I’ve heard it said that now is the time to speak ‘heart to heart’ about race, and yet comments are still made like, “Can’t we give Bill O’Reilly a pass due to his ignorance?”
I’d like to address this last incident, and add my opinion to the mix. I think that we should not give Bill O’Reilly a pass precisely because this is a great opportunity to take our conversation about race a step deeper to the next level. In saying this, I am by no means suggesting we gang up on Mr. O’Reilly and seek his censure or worse in a manner similar to Don Imus. I think what Mr. O’Reilly said was very revealing and it could serve as an excellent object lesson without costing the gentleman his job.
Bill O’Reilly & Unintentional Racism
(First, a little background via some direct quotes of Bill O’Reilly’s remarks.)
Last week our brother Ed Gilbreath wrote a post on Racism vs. Gracism. In this piece Ed mentions a new book out by Pastor David Anderson entitled Gracism: The Art of Inclusion. You can read an interview Ed did with Dr. Anderson in the current edition of Today’s Christian magazine. In this same post Ed mentions an article in the Chicago Tribune by columnist Clarence Page and he suggests that this is an example of gracism. Using the following definition of gracism given by Dr. Anderson in that interview, I tend to disagree with my brother on this point. You can read my comment on Ed’s blog here.
(Ed G.) What is Gracism?
(Dr. Anderson) Gracism is the positive extension of favor to people, both in spite of and because of color, class, or culture. It's not affirmative action but intentional actions of grace and affirmation. So whenever we see a racist act, instead of responding in a way that is punitive, gracism calls us to respond in the way that God—that Jesus— might respond.
The reason I mention this post by brother Ed and the article by Clarence Page is because the subject of Mr. Page’s article is the Bill O’Reilly incident. Here are a few quotes from that article.
Giving soft bigotry a break
Clarence Page
September 30, 2007
Does ignorance about race make you a racist? That boiling question bubbles at the heart of the controversy that Fox News star Bill O'Reilly's kicked up with his poorly received compliments of black diners in a New York restaurant. My answer is, no, ignorance about race does not always make you a racist, but it can make you sound like one.
That's O'Reilly's problem. O'Reilly has been vilified recently by the liberal-leaning Web site Media Matters for America for insinuating how surprised he was to discover how (Gasp!) civilized black folks behaved while dining in Sylvia's, one of (Double gasp!) Harlem's best-known restaurants.
"I couldn't get over the fact that there was no difference between Sylvia's restaurant and any other restaurant in New York City," he marveled. "I mean, it was exactly the same, even though it's run by blacks, primarily black patronship."
Yup, they had knives, forks and everything! Just like white folks!
"It was like going into an Italian restaurant in an all-white suburb in the sense of people [who] were sitting there," he said, "and they were ordering and having fun. And there wasn't any kind of craziness at all."
Nope, no lap dancing, either.
"There wasn't one person in Sylvia's who was screaming, 'M-F-er, I want more iced tea! ' " O'Reilly said, sounding almost disappointed.
I find these comments by Mr. O’Reilly quite appalling and in my comment on Ed’s blog I say that this is typical of a mindset of cultural imperialism. Many of our white brothers and sisters come to the table truly wanting to help our cause and offer their services. When they assume that the standards we should all strive to achieve are white standards, then we have a problem. This goes back, once again, to the issue of white people (and some people of color) learning the hard lesson of the unspoken assumption of white (cultural) supremacy. When we come together we need to recognize that none of us has a monopoly on all the right answers. There are lots of positive things that we can learn from each other, but we must first adopt an attitude of humility and become teachable. The ignorance of white and black liberals and the condescension and patronizing attitudes that accompanied their participation in the Civil Rights movement is one prominent reason why many Afro-Americans today have resigned and moved towards affirming black nationalism and other forms of separatism.
At worst, O'Reilly appears to be afflicted with what President Bush calls "the soft bigotry of low expectations."
But that's OK. How else will O'Reilly, I or anybody else learn anything if we don't make a few boneheaded mistakes once in a while? My greater fear than hearing O'Reilly talk himself into a politically incorrect hole is the silence of those afraid to say anything about race for fear of offending someone. We need more candid talk about race and class, not less.
Here is where I whole heartily agree with Mr. Page and why I insist that we NOT give Bill O’Reilly a pass. Should he be tarred and feathered? I say no, but I feel that he must be confronted and if this is done in a gracious manner (gracism in action), then perhaps our conversation and dialogue can move us forward.
Blessings,
Shlomo
Recent Comments